The development of architecture is a continuous progress with history. The articles of Piranesi and LeRoy both addresses the issue of the aesthetics of architecture. Based on the utilitarian and functional values, the beauty of architecture should be considered as a fundamental property as well. Any attempt to criticize, simplify, and limit ornamentations without a thorough consideration of the historical origins and considerations of these ornamentations is not advisable.
Through the studies by LeRoy on Greek architecture, the path of development is gradually revealed on how architecture went from purely functional to a symbol of culture. Structures such as beams and columns, first served the purpose of supporting the architecture. They must keep the people inside the building safe first, before developing other purposes. However, this does not diminish the importance of forms and grandeur. According to LeRoy, this created a “pleasing effect on the eyes.” Piranesi raised similar opinions on the issue, as he criticized the “monotonous” architectural beliefs that overlooks how people feel in the architecture. Without innovation, people might just live in huts like the primitives did, which is entirely undesirable.
Architectural practices are continuous. It is like a river, and must be considered from the continuous and historical perspective. When comparing the architectural aesthetics of the Greeks and the Romans, LeRoy made reference to the history when the Romans invaded Greece, and imitated their glorious architectural technique and style. This gives Greek architecture a sense of “superiority.” Piranesi also addresses the importance of architraves, friezes, and cornices. However, he should not have criticized the “primitive huts” for being monotonous and boring. The ancestors of the Greeks once lived in those primitive huts as well. It was the accumulation of architectural innovation and wisdom, that contributed to the great heights it achieved later.
Therefore, people should be more cautious when criticizing the traditional ornamentations. Architectural aesthetics are passed on from generation to generation. While the practices and the techniques remain, the original motivations and considerations behind the design are easily lost with history. Therefore, it is crucial that one fully understands these motivations before criticizing, or making innovations based on previous architecture. While it is easy to refute something that seems tedious and unnecessary, it is much harder to rediscover architectural aesthetics that is lost in history. Therefore, both of the authors emphasize that people should cherish respect the legacy of traditional architecture. Meanwhile, innovation is also important for the further development of architecture, which should be based on the profound understanding of the significance of the various techniques.
In conclusion, architecture and aesthetics are a pair of inseparable concepts. People naturally generate a feeling when they enter a building. It is thus the responsibility of architects to provoke the pleasant feelings from the users, through the various aesthetic designs, such as the use of ornamentations, and perspective. Continuation of traditions and innovation are equally important for architecture, which should both be based on respect and understanding.
